Supreme Court Scrutinizes Lengthy Law Courses: Is Reform on the Horizon?
The Supreme Court is currently deliberating on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the duration and curriculum of LL.B. and LL.M. programmes across India. The petitioner contends that the current structure, particularly the five-year integrated course, is unnecessarily long and financially burdensome for students.
The PIL argues that a shorter, more streamlined curriculum would enhance accessibility and affordability, making legal education more inclusive. It also highlights concerns regarding the quality of legal education delivered under the current system.
The petitioner’s plea seeks the establishment of a Legal Education Commission to comprehensively review and reform the LL.B. and LL.M. curricula. This commission, it is argued, would be crucial in ensuring the courses remain relevant and efficient in producing competent legal professionals.
The Supreme Court’s decision in this case holds significant implications for the future of legal education in India. A potential overhaul of the curriculum could significantly impact the cost and accessibility of legal training, ultimately shaping the legal landscape of the nation. The hearing continues.
